Whenever I give a talk about writing, one
of the questions that comes up is whether I prefer to write longhand or to use
the keyboard. When I started writing over thirty years ago, computers were
expensive so I used an electric typewriter. Even then, I wrote my first drafts
in longhand, as typing wasn’t something I associated with creativity. It was
what I did in my day job. Pen to paper was for creative pursuits. My habit was—and
still is—to write a first draft in longhand, using a pencil, type it up while
making changes, print the draft out, then make more pencil edits.
Since I’m often concerned that I’m not
writing quickly enough, I’ve tried over the past three years to write a first
draft straight onto the computer. I’ve liked the results, although I still make
as many changes as I did with the longhand.approach. Also, I’m one of those
people who will write anywhere, and lugging a laptop around doesn’t appeal to
me. A pad and pencil is lighter.
Even though writing first drafts and making
changes on the screen has become more natural, I’m still drawn to pad and
paper, and editing with pencil. There’s always been something about the brain-to-hand-to-paper
motion that helps me to slow down and think about what I’m writing rather
than just bashing out words on a page.
I didn’t understand why this process works
so well until I came across an article in the examiner which discusses
studies on the way the brain functions while working with paper compared to
keyboards. One of the studies took 65 college students and gave half of them an
offline laptop to take notes while the other half were given notebooks. The
results showed that although both groups performed equally well on fact
recalling, those who’d used laptops scored significantly lower on their
conceptual understanding. The researchers suggested that the typers were taking
notes verbatim and not processing what they were hearing while the writers were
reframing the lecture in their own words and therefore processing the
information better.
The article also referenced a 1940s study
which suggested that typing essentially robbed the writer of the creative
process. The researcher suggested that the word doesn’t pass through the hand
while typing but instead appears through a mechanized pressure of the hand and
therefore loses something in the translation, so to speak. I think
subconsciously, I’ve always believed that, but never actually heard someone
express it in that way before. Of course, I’m sure there are plenty of
studies that will refute the 1940’s study, but it seems clear that we can’t
discount the importance of the brain-to-hand-to-paper function.
No comments:
Post a Comment