I came across an interesting blog by novelist Jon F. Merz
this week, where he wrote (and apparently has written) a lot about the changing
tide in publishing. You’ve heard it before: traditional publishers are losing
their stronghold on publishing and many still refuse to accept that
self-publishing is working well for a number of authors. He believes publishers
are still spewing a load of BS about the importance of traditional publishing
because of better editing and marketing, etc. Merz wrote that of his first four
books published by Kensington, only one was edited. He also wrote that the
national TV, radio, and print campaign he understood would be forthcoming never
happened. Needless to say, he’s now a champion of self-publishing, stating that
complete control over one’s publishing career is better, as are the royalties
(70% vs. 17.5% his publisher paid). Merz believes this is truly the time of
what he calls the Authorpreneur.
An Authorpreneur, he says, is someone who embraces
technology that puts them in charge of their own destiny. They study the
industry and position themselves to take advantage. They work continuously at
their craft and adopt many hats, including editing and formatting, hiring cover
designers, and marketing, etc. Merz ends the piece by saying it’s the time of
the Authorpreneur and it’s about time, too. http://jonfmerz.net/blog/
Well, maybe, but maybe not. Not all traditional publishers drop the
ball as badly as his did. My publisher edited both of my books. They sent out
many advanced review copies, which resulted in reviews I could never hope to gain as a self-publisher. They also have my books distributed through the
Chapters chain, something self-publishers cannot do thanks to chain's policies.
Secondly, many of the authors who’ve left traditional
publishing to celebrate the control self-publishing offers had already
developed a readership, largely due to better distribution and access to reviews
self-publishers would kill for. Would people like Konrath and Dean Wesley Smith
be selling as many copies today if they were just releasing their first titles
now, as self-publishers?
Third, and here’s my main point: a lot of self-published
authors don’t want to be Authorpreneurs, aren’t keeping abreast of industry
changes, and don’t view writing and publishing as a business. I don’t want to
speculate on the percentage of self-published authors who have no interest in
working that hard, but I’m guessing that it’s pretty high. Despite technology, ease
of publishing, and access to potential readers, it’s not that much easier to
sell a book, especially in large numbers, as a self-publisher than as a
traditionally published author. Just ask the authors (indie and traditionally
published) on Kindleboards who share their stats, good and bad.
The bottom line is that, sure, for many lucky, excellent, or
marketing savvy authors, self-publishing’s time has come, but there are plenty
of others who are watching from the sidelines, their single copy in hand, wondering
how they managed to miss the boat, and whether they should really care. After
all, there’s always another book to write, another chance at fame and fortune.
2 comments:
I don`t think it matters whether you are self-published, published by an independent company or with one of the big six, authors have to go in knowing that they will be expected to self-market. Many publishers won`t consider signing a contract with an author who hasn`t already got a social media platform in place.
Writing is a business as well as an art form.
Thanks for your thoughtful comments, Alison!
Post a Comment